Just finished filing my taxes for 2012. I use TurboTax, so it's
fairly easy, except for putting in the information. I also discovered I
reviewed fewer books last year than in previous years, but I pretty
much knew that. So few that I don't even warrant a 1099 for last year.
That is disheartening and a little bit nice. It's not that I like
reviewing fewer books. I certainly miss the money; however, I do like
having time to read books I want to read rather than have to read to
review. After 10 years this August of reviewing for Authorlink, I am
disappointed that I don't rate the kinds of books I request to read.
The newer, lower paid, reviewers often get what I've chosen from the
list, and I think I should have first choice since I am the senior
reviewer. Guess not. Money rules even in reviewing.
Speaking of
reviewing, I was asked by the owner and managing editor of The
Celebrity Cafe if I would take on reviewing CDs and books for them. I
seldom listen to music, although that is changing, and don't feel
qualified to review new music. I did explain that I wouldn't mind
helping out with book reviews if he'd like to send me the list for me
to choose from, and then I quoted the price I get for reviewing books
from Authorlink. I haven't heard another word since then.
It
isn't that I don't appreciate the extra attention from writing for
their site, but as a professional I do expect to be paid, especially
when the online entertainment magazine is getting all kinds of
advertising and the regular staff is paid, and when they even pay
interns $500 a month. I should be paid. I'm not some teenager or
twenty-something wannabe writer anxious to write for anyone for free
just for the experience. I have tons of experience, but I still cannot
support myself on writing alone. To borrow a quote, This writer cannot
live on exposure and experience alone. My creditors expect real dollars
for their goods and services and I'd be out from under this brand new
roof it took me 4 years to get in a heartbeat if I paid the rent with
anything less than legal tender. I mean, really.
Any going
concern lauded for their look, style, and publication that gets paid by
advertisers and pays their regular staff can certainly pay me for my
contributions, especially when they beg and plead for me to write for
them all the time. I have a full time job, a review gig, a writing
business, and my own projects I like to get done from time to time, not
to mention a house to maintain and a mail carrier to fight with. I
don't have the time. It's not like I toss off an article in 15 minutes;
I research, write, edit, and add all kinds of little doodads and
videos and links, and that takes time.
For instance, I wrote a
top ten list of what people were Googling most in 2012, complete with
doodads, videos, research, and links. The whole article took about 4
hours of my precious time. I enjoyed doing it and it was in response to
a request from one of the paid editors to help fill their pages after
the first of the year. They didn't pay me and the article went live
after some adjustments on their end (they didn't tell me all they
wanted me to do with it) and they benefited from the article since it
was the most read piece in the whole magazine during that week. They
benefited with advertising dollars, but I didn't benefit from anything
by the byline. No pay. No thank you. No nothing -- unless you count
them coming back and asking for more. Considering what I put into that
article, I don't think so, especially not with everything already on my
plate.
Oh, well, c'est la vie -- or in actuality -- telle est la vie d'écriture (such is the life of a writer).
The
thing about writing is that there are so many amateurs and wannabes
and hacks out there begging to be read that editors and owners of
magazines, newspapers, etc. who need content will take advantage of
anyone -- often without their permission -- and never pay the writers.
That's fine for a kid still being supported by their parents or wannabe
and amateur writers willing to work for free to get the experience, but
I'm no amateur, wannabe, or hack, and I'm certainly not that anxious
for exposure without being paid. I expect to get paid. I've paid my
dues, now pay me, especially when you benefit from my hard work and
experience. Quid pro quo -- or in more common terms -- Where's my money?
Even the garbage man gets paid.
It's one thing to be inched
out by lower paid writers at a business that I have worked for since
2003 and another to be used and abused while making money from my toil.
I have begun to believe the way Harlan Ellison believes. A writer
should be paid. I am a professional writer and I'm tired of editors
begging me to write for them for the experience and exposure. At 57
years of age, I have experience and I've been exposed sufficiently for a
while.
Well, I didn't mean to turn this into a rant, but it
has turned out that way. When writers work for free they undermine the
bedrock upon which we all stand. Write for free for magazines that have
advertisers and circulation and cost money to get and you undercut the
professional writer who expects to be paid for their work. The editors
will dress up your words and make them look professional, but you
still won't get paid, and you less the chance of professional writers
who would have been paid.
Writing for free is the equivalent of
corporations and businesses outsourcing jobs, and writing is a job.
People who were willing to work for free or break through picket lines
are called scabs by unions, and I can't say they're wrong. I understand
that people will do anything for virtually nothing if they're hungry
and desperate enough, and they don't care about the people who should
be paid for their work -- or at least were being paid until management
decided to walk away from negotiation tables. Still, I'm not asking for
time and a half, cheap health insurance, more vacation and holidays,
or even a chicken in my new crockpot. I'm asking for what I deserve and
have worked for most of my life -- to be paid for my work. Four hours
in the life of a working writer with a full time job (actually 2 full
time jobs when you count writing novels), is a lot of time and should
be compensated. Honestly, I don't know how The Huffington Post
gets away with getting professionals to write for free while Ariana
Huffington rakes in the bucks. Something is definitely rotten in Denmark
-- and here in America when working professionals cannot get paid.
Well, some working professionals do get paid. Prostitutes always get the money up front.
3 comments:
Yes, doing your taxes using a software definitely makes things easier. As for the information, it would be great to start collecting them first before doing the paperwork. It’s only January, and the deadline isn’t until April, so it’s great you’re already finished. That’ll be one less thing to stress about!
++ Clemencia Summers
Oh, it’s nice to know that you filed your taxes earlier before the deadline. A lot of people used to file their taxes right before or exactly during the cut-off date. That way of filing gives taxpayers a lot more stress rather than having it done in advance. The idea of filing along with people who also want to reach the deadline is already a hassle. Unlike with paying on time, you can relax immediately afterwards and focus on things that you need to work on.
Winston Sutton
Filing early can save you from long lines and other hassles that come with last minute tax filing. Also, doing so gives you ample time to do the computation properly, as rushing often leads to committing mistakes. Continue doing it yearly!
-Elias Brasel @ OnCoreBookKeeping
Post a Comment